The Evolution of Guantanamo Bay
by William L. Pfeifer, Jr.
This is a series of four articles published on
ThePoliticus.com in February of
2009.
Within hours of taking the oath of office, President Barack
Obama issued an executive order temporarily suspending all
prosecutions of the “unlawful enemy combatants” being held at
the Guantánamo Bay Detention Camp. After approximately seven
years of the Bush administration asserting the right to conduct
military tribunals under a system which attempted to deny
detainees access to the federal courts or even to the military
justice system, President Obama has made clear his intention to
close the camp and bring an end to Bush's controversial
program. What remains to be seen is what specific plan will be
implemented by Obama to replace the current system, and what he
will do with the prisoners who are still in custody.
Guantánamo Bay Naval Base – A Brief
History
Although the United States does not have official diplomatic
relations with the current Cuban government, the United States
Navy has operated a base in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, for over a
century. It is the only United States military base located in
a communist country, and was established long before Castro's
government came into power. The United States first began using
Guantánamo Bay in 1898 during the Spanish-American War, and
obtained a perpetual lease of the area in 1903 from an American
citizen, Tomás Estrada Palma, when he became Cuba's first
president. The original lease payment was $2,000.00 in gold
coins per year.
In 1934, the lease was renegotiated and made permanent
unless the governments of the United States and Cuba mutually
agreed to break it or if the United States abandoned the base.
When Fidel Castro seized control of Cuba in 1959, his
government denied the validity of the lease but inadvertently
cashed the first lease payment it received. The United States
government has treated the Cuban government's acceptance of
that payment as an official validation of the lease. However,
the Cuban government asserts that the check was cashed in error
and has refused to cash any lease payments since that time.
The Cuban government claims that the lease was obtained by
force and is therefore illegal under international law. It
further argues that the United States has broken the terms of
the lease by allowing commercial use and other unauthorized
uses of the property. The United States government disagrees,
disregards the Cuban demands for the return of the property,
and uses the naval station in Guantánamo Bay as a central part
of its military operations in the Caribbean. The naval base
provides support to the Navy and to the Coast Guard in
providing regional security to the United States coastline, in
combatting drug trafficking, and in the fight against
terrorism.
As recently as January 28, 2009, Cuban Foreign Minister
Felipe Perez demanded that the United States return control of
Guantánamo Bay back to Cuba, saying, “We have always said that
Cuba expects to recover this territory.” A similar demand was
made by Cuban President Raul Castro a few days earlier. It is
assumed that these demands will be ignored by President Obama,
just as they have been ignored by his predecessors in the White
House.
Guantánamo Bay Detention Camp
The naval base was assigned a new responsibility after the
terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 – that of incarcerating
non-U.S. citizens accused of terrorist acts and making them
stand trial before military tribunals. On January 11, 2002, the
first military plane carrying 20 prisoners from Afghanistan
landed at Guantánamo Bay, and a steady stream of detainees
continued to arrive after that. Most of those seized were not
captured by Americans, but were arrested by militias in
Pakistan and Afghanistan and turned over to the United States
military under allegations of being members of the Taliban or
al-Qaeda. The methods of identifying those who would be
incarcerated at the detention camp, and the interrogation
techniques used on them (such as water boarding, long time
standing, and the cold cell), have been highly
controversial.
The Guantánamo detainee trials operated under procedures
which are not permitted in the Unites States court systems nor
in the regular military court systems. For example, detainees
were denied access to much of the evidence against them, their
choice of attorney was severely restricted, and the officers
conducting the trials were allowed to consider secret evidence
without providing the accused the right to cross-examine or
challenge it.
Perhaps the most criticized aspect of the Guantánamo trials
was the use of evidence obtained through “coercive techniques.”
There has been much debate over where the line can be drawn
between a harsh but legal interrogation and illegal torture. As
critics have noted, anyone will confess to anything if they are
subjected to a sufficient amount of torture. While torturous
and extreme interrogation techniques have yielded confessions,
the reliability of admissions made under such circumstances is
doubtful. Nonetheless, supporters of the program claim that the
interrogations yielded significant information which could not
otherwise be obtained.
Out of the 779 prisoners who have been imprisoned in
Guantánamo, over 500 of them were eventually released. Many
were released without standing trial or ever being formally
charged with a crime. Some whose releases have been authorized
are still stuck in Guantánamo, because the government cannot
return them to their home country but also refuses to release
them into the U.S. Others are still incarcerated and waiting to
go to trial on the allegations against them, if such trials
ever occur.
While some released detainees have disappeared after their
release or have returned to normal lives, others have drawn
attention in a more negative way. The Pentagon claims that at
least 18 former Guantánamo detainees have returned to terrorist
activities, and many others are suspected of having joined or
rejoined terrorist groups as well. A notable example is Said
Ali al-Shihri, who was captured in Pakistan and incarcerated at
the Guantánamo detention center for six years. In 2007, he was
released to the Saudi government for rehabilitation. However,
last week he reemerged publicly as a top deputy in a branch of
al-Qaida in Yemen, a group which is believed to have been
involved in multiple attacks on the U.S. Embassy in Yemen's
capital city of Sana.
Former detainees like Al-Shihri demonstrate the major
difficulty facing the Obama administration in dealing with the
current detainees in Guantánamo. Over the next few weeks, Obama
is expected to issue new orders related to the handling of the
detainees, and a major overhaul of the system for dealing with
them is imminent. Future articles in this series will explore
the battles which have been fought in the court system over the
detainee situation, will track the new programs and policies
proposed by the Obama administration, and will follow the
upcoming trials over those detainees who remain in custody.
The rest of this article can be read on ww.ThePoliticus.com
here:
http://thepoliticus.com/content/evolution-guantanamo-bay
Part Two is located here:
http://thepoliticus.com/content/evolution-gitmo-part-2
Part Three is located here:
http://thepoliticus.com/content/evolution-gitmo-part-3
The fourth and final article is located here:
http://thepoliticus.com/content/evolution-gitmo-part-4
|